Backlash grows against police in Nancy Guthrie case after suspension revelation
Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos has headed the investigation into Nancy Guthrie's disappearance from her Arizona home since day one
Backlash has been steadily building against the lead investigator in the case of Nancy Guthrie's disappearance on February 1, with Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos coming under fire for past disciplinary issues as the investigation approaches its 12th week.
The sheriff's history at the El Paso Police Department in Texas has drawn criticism as he resigned from his position in 1982 in order to avoid disciplinary action. He addressed the allegations that he misrepresented himself when applying for a job at the Pima County Police Department in the '80s, after leaving his job in Texas.
Chris' lawyer responded to the probe into his past with a 22-page document that explained his conduct. "Sheriff Nanos resigned from the El Paso Police Department in 1982. At the time of his resignation, he held the rank of corporal," the document read.
© Getty Images
Sheriff Chris Nanos has come under fire in recent weeks
"His resignation came in the wake of a dispute with a supervisor over the towing of vehicles. The supervisor wanted to impose a three-day suspension for insubordination. Sheriff Nanos appealed that recommended discipline to the Chief, who found in favor of the supervisor."
"Rather than accept a three-day suspension, Sheriff Nanos offered to resign in lieu of discipline. The Chief accepted his offer, and Sheriff Nanos resigned," he continued. The document added that he had not lied about his employment history, and wrote on his resume that he left the job in 1982, despite the Pima County Sheriff's Department website stating that he left in 1984.
Chris' lawyer also acknowledged the disciplinary actions he was subject to at El Paso, including "counselling, reprimands and suspensions". The letter then spoke on the sheriff's previous statement under oath that he had never been suspended as a result of disciplinary action.
© Getty Images
The sheriff has lead the Nancy Guthrie investigation since day one
"It is 100% correct that Sheriff Nanos was never suspended during his four decades of decorated and faithful service with the Pima County Sheriff's Department," his lawyer wrote to the Pima County Board of Supervisors.
"However, Sheriff Nanos was suspended more than forty years ago while employed by [the] El Paso Police Department. In the context of his live deposition, Sheriff Nanos did not understand the question related to discipline with a different agency not governed by the Arizona Peace Officers' Bill of Rights."
Social media users quickly shared their distaste for the sheriff after his past in El Paso came to light. "Everyone wants him gone," wrote one X user, while another added that "people are angry". A third chimed in that Chris had "botched this [case] from the start," while a fourth added: "My gut is telling me it was totally mishandled."
© Getty Images
Chris faced backlash from social media users
Chris did garner support from some social media users, with one writing: "Wasn't this decades ago? [In my opinion] he is working hard to find Nancy Guthrie," while another added that the focus on his past was "fueling a dishonest narrative" about Chris' competency.
© WireImage
Nancy went missing from her Arizona home in February
The Pima County Sheriff's Department has worked closely with the FBI since Nancy went missing in February. While several suspects have been questioned regarding her disappearance, no arrests have been made, and DNA evidence is still being examined by the authorities.
Nancy, the 84-year-old mother of Today show star Savannah Guthrie, was believed to have been taken by force from her home in Tucson, Arizona, after blood was found on the doorstep, and her personal effects were found inside the house.
BREAKING: Tim Walz is reportedly starting to ‘suffer from... See more
Why Everyone Suddenly Can’t Ignore Tim Walz, The Quiet Leader Now Driving a National Political Shift
For years, Tim Walz built his reputation the slow way-without spectacle, without constant headlines, and without the kind of political theatrics that dominate modern media cycles. He wasn’t the loudest voice in the room. He didn’t rely on controversy to stay relevant. Instead, his approach was grounded in consistency, discipline, and a steady focus on public service. You may like Brianna Looked Straight At The Camera For This More… 880 220 293 Everyone Laughed At His Wife Later She Revealed Fer Transformatio More… 563 141 188 That approach, for a long time, kept him somewhat outside the national spotlight. Not invisible-but not central either. He was known, respected, and recognized, especially within his state. But nationally, he was often seen as part of the broader political landscape rather than a defining figure within it.
That changed-fast. What began as a routine political development in Minnesota quickly escalated into something far larger. At first, it seemed like just another policy discussion, the kind that typically stays within state lines. But within hours, the conversation expanded. Media outlets picked it up. Analysts weighed in. Political observers across the country began dissecting what was happening and what it might mean. Suddenly, Walz wasn’t just a state leader handling local matters. He was at the center of a national conversation. And the shift wasn’t subtle.
For someone who had spent years operating with a low-profile, results-driven approach, the sudden surge of attention marked a turning point. It forced a broader audience to take a closer look-not just at the situation itself, but at the man behind it. What they found wasn’t new. But it felt newly relevant.
The Defining Leadership Style
Walz’s leadership style has always been defined by a kind of quiet practicality. He doesn’t chase headlines, but he doesn’t avoid responsibility either. He tends to focus on execution rather than presentation-on getting things done rather than ensuring everyone is watching while he does it. That kind of approach doesn’t always stand out in an environment where visibility often matters more than substance. But when circumstances shift, that same approach can suddenly feel exactly what people are looking for.
The recent attention didn’t come from a dramatic reinvention. There was no sudden change in tone, no strategic pivot designed to capture attention. If anything, the attention came because he didn’t change. While others react quickly, recalibrate messaging, or lean into the moment, Walz’s response reflected the same pattern he’s followed for years-measured, deliberate, and focused on outcomes rather than optics. That consistency, once easy to overlook, became a defining feature.
Observers began to notice something that had always been there but hadn’t been widely emphasized: his ability to navigate complex situations without escalating them unnecessarily, to communicate without inflaming, and to act without turning every decision into a performance. In a political environment often driven by urgency and reaction, that kind of steadiness stands out.
May you like
National Recognition and Its Implications
And it raises questions. Not about whether he can handle attention-but about what that attention might lead to. Because once a public figure crosses from regional recognition into national relevance, expectations change. The scope of influence expands. Every decision carries more weight. Every statement is examined more closely. That transition doesn’t happen gradually. It happens in moments like this. Moments where the spotlight shifts unexpectedly and stays longer than anyone anticipated.
For Walz, the increased attention signals more than just temporary interest. It suggests a broader reevaluation of his role-not just within Minnesota, but within the larger national political landscape. People are no longer just observing what he does locally. They’re asking what it means beyond that. And that shift brings both opportunity and pressure.
